[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tesla's World Electrical System (was Field Mill Voltmeter



Original poster: "Malcolm Watts by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>" <m.j.watts-at-massey.ac.nz>

Hi Richard,
            I visited Delphion's site to have a look:

On 4 May 01, at 16:55, Tesla list wrote:

> Original poster: "Richard Wayne Wall by way of Terry Fritz
> <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>" <rwall-at-ix-dot-netcom-dot-com>
> 
> 5/4/01
> 
> Bill Wysock and list,
> 
> Bill the problem you point out is that most people want to analyze
> Teslas longitudinal transmission systems in terms of orthodox
> transverse EM transmission theory.  This absolutely cannot be done. 
> The language and physics don't permit it.  This presents a huge
> barrier in their comprehension of what's really going on with Teslas
> longitudinal transmission.  Through no fault of their own, they have
> been educationally denied the existence of transverse EM wave theory. 
> However, the "most learned" should be faulted for not keeping an open
> mind and out of hand dismissing the work and ideas of others.  The
> history of physics is riddled with the corpses of these die hard nay
> longitudinal.
> 
> For those who demand proof of longitudinal transmission perhaps the
> following link will interest you.  It is a US patent for a
> hyper-light-speed antenna utilizing longitudinal propagation in
> another spatial dimension.  Hint: Aether.  (gasp!)
> 
> So, here is a modern example of Teslas longitudinal
> transmission/reception embodied in real hardware.  The concepts while
> a little foreign are not that complicated and the antennas should be
> relatively easy to construct.  So, time to get cracking.  Eh, Malcolm?
> 
> <http://www.delphion-dot-com/details?&pn=US06025810__>http://www.delphion.
> com/d etails?&pn=US06025810__
> 
> RWW

Time to get cracking on what? I can't say I'm terribly impressed but 
the encouragement to generate spurious patents is certainly there. I 
didn't see a shred of proof anywhere to support the "faster than 
light" transmission claim. Maybe I didn't look hard enough?

Regards,
malcolm