Re: Superconductivity

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "Jason Petrou by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <jasonp-at-btinternet-dot-com>

Hi Nele,

I think you may have a point about losses.. however in a standard disruptor
coils and TCs much of the losses are in the SG> Design a lossless SG and we
will be getting somewhere...

Jason
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
To: <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 6:42 PM
Subject: Superconductivity


> Original poster: "Nebojsa Kovacevic by way of Terry Fritz
<twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <morfeus-at-EUnet.yu>
>
> 73
> After some time reading the people`s comments on the list, I realize that
> there is still one big problem in increasing the coils efficiency:
everyone
> have to realize that the basic design of the coil didn`t change for a
really
> long time(don`t want to mention how long). I heard about problems with the
> top loads, conductors, primary power...... we have to move a bit further
> from where we are I think. After some researching I realize that we could
> build a whole new area of research in the field of Tesla coils. How? By
> using the superconductivity. With no looses at all!!!
> Recently, I have build some machines based on the principles of
> superconductivity, that works more than great, and are a scientific proof
of
> what could be done with TC, if we use superconductors as a new technology.
> This field is very problematic, and it needs some argumented polemics. So,
> if anyone else on the list had some experiences with this, and want to
open
> a new area of research, he is more then welcome.
>
> Kind regards to all,
> Nele!
>
>
>