[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fwd: Spark gap not firing]
Original poster: "by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>" <Parpp807-at-aol-dot-com>
In a message dated 2/10/01 12:13:54 AM Central Standard Time,
tesla-at-pupman-dot-com writes:
<< Hi John C.,
There have been numberous discussions on these
configurations as you know since you were part of them. I
believe the consensus showed that the coilers who lost NST's
in the cap||xfmr configuration were very real and that the
gap||xfmr configuration was best for the reasons stated
previously. In either configuration, if the NST does not
have overvoltage protection gaps, then NST death is almost
certain. I don't think we can adequately say that all these
NST's died for the same reason. But, we can say that the
addition of safety gaps and gap||xfmr configuration is less
of a risk than the other.
Take care,
Bart>>
Hi Bart, John C., Terry,
This is a great class.
I have been playing with my bipolars for a little over two years, using a
parallel
combo of two 15/60 NSTs, the classical cap-SG circuit, and no safety gap. I
thought I knew it all. :-)) Aware of the stresses on the NSTs, I have kept
the runs short and the gaps set close for the 0.023 uF MMC. I have not blown
a transformer--yet.
Since the NST is current limited by the magnetic shunts, it is understandable
that
a high frequency backfire can suddenly increase the impedance and drive the
current
into a brick wall. When Bart told me about Terry's NST protection filter and
the
preferred use of the SG-cap configuration I got instant religion and
installed the protection filter on what is now three NSTs for 15/150. I am
still using the cap-SG circuit. So I assumed that all the classical diagrams
in John's books and in Circular 74 assume the use of a non-current limited
transformer like a pole transformer. Now, just when I thought I had reached a
little understanding, amazingly I do not understand why a
non-current limited transformer is also susceptible to damage from a high
frequency
backfire. Is a non-current limited transformer at least less susceptible?
Very slooow learning taking place.
Happy day,
Ralph Zekelman