[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Larger secondary more efficiency?

At 06:21 PM 10/9/2000 +1300, you wrote:
snip...> Terry
>I must clarify here. When I say 11.8 inches, I mean diameter. I intended on
>making the secondary
>8" wide and 40" tall,
>but 11.8" Wide is all I can get. I would keep the 40" Tall dimension.
>Is this too large?
>Alan Williams

Hi Alan,

"I" think 8 wide by 40 tall is fine.  That is right in line with all the
calculations and stuff.  You will not go wrong with this size...