Re: Seconday form length question

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: Seconday form length question
• From: "Barton B. Anderson" <tesla123-at-pacbell-dot-net> (by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>)
• Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 19:41:55 -0700
• Approved: twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net
• Delivered-To: fixup-tesla-at-pupman-dot-com-at-fixme

>
> Original Poster: "Bob Berg" <berg_bob-at-hotmail-dot-com> 
>  

Hi Bob, 
Don't think it would hurt performance at all. 
As far as auto-adjusting the secondary, well, lot's of people have considered
it but I haven't heard of anyone actually doing it. Of course it could be done
in a miriad of ways (pneumatic, hydraulic, electrical (threaded rod, cam
design, etc..). I never got around to it yet, but if you give it a go, please
report back. The only concern I have is to keep the operator and device
actuating the motion out of harms way (electrically) should the unforseen
occur. 

Bart 
>
>   
> Would it hurt performance if I leave an extra 12 - 16" of PVC at the end 
> (bottom) of my seconday. (Unwound)  I want to have the seconday pass through 
> the top of the support table and and secure it at the base.  Of course I 
> would only have the winding from where I needed from the primary up 22-24 
> inches (4.5" seconday). This will also allow me to adjust coupling by 
> allowing me to move it up or down. 
> --- Has anyone come up with a way to adjust coupling while the coil is 
> running?  some kind of motorized system that would allow the operater to 
> raise or lower the seconday while the coil is running?  Sounds interesting. 
>
> Thanks 
> Bob 
>
> ______________________________________________________ 
> Get Your Private, Free Email at
<http://www.hotmail-dot-com>http://www.hotmail-dot-com

• Prev: Re: TOROIDS
• Next: Re: TOROIDS
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread