[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
RE: Question about ballasting and VA
Bart/Jeff,
I use the same process as Jeff with similar results. On thing I have noticed
though is the variable inductor seems to affect the phasing of SRSG and
vica-versa.
If I change the dwell on my SRSG I will then need to vary the inductor
setting to get back to best performance. The process is adjust the SRSG,
then the ballast, then the SRSG, etc.
With my SRSG set up for 240bps I can adjust the inductor and get 240bps or
120bps (there are also some firings in between but it's real nasty). 120bps
always works better and it seems to be independent of the physical motor
offset/phase.
Brian B.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tesla List [mailto:tesla-at-pupman-dot-com]
Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2000 8:54 PM
To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: Question about ballasting and VA
Original Poster: "Barton B. Anderson" <tesla123-at-pacbell-dot-net>
> Original Poster: "Jeff W. Parisse" <jparisse-at-teslacoil-dot-com>
>
Hi Jeff,
Your method described is interesting (that you find the least current draw
at
low voltage then leave the ballast setting in place and just use voltage
control). Have you used this method with different spark gap rates, types,
etc...? If so, did each rate or type of gap produce the same control
behavier
(lowest current point on the inductor)?
Bart
> Here's what I observe in the field:
>
> At low voltage I find the inductance point that produces the least current
> draw at the mains. This is also the point where the coil runs most
smoothly.
> Then I raise voltage for the desired effect. The inductance point remains
> the same over a wide range of voltages. Current draw indeed goes up
> as I raise the voltage but not the "least current" point on the inductor.