[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Who needs a quenching gap ?
Original poster: FutureT-at-aol-dot-com
In a message dated 12/8/00 2:18:31 PM Eastern Standard Time, tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
writes:
> Unfortunately this design, (which was suggested by Terry, when he made
> his last rotary) cannot be altered in this coil, to make comparisons
> btwn. 1 and 2 gaps, but the design here really was simplifyed a lot by
> using this one gap solution, so I used it anyway.
>
> I will work on this thing some more on separate gaps, where it will be
> possible to reverse btwn both configurations, and see, if the loss added
> in another gap is lower than the loss in the friction contact.
Finn,
You could add an external single static gap in series with the rotary,
to give a total of 2 gaps.
John Freau