Re: Tesla FAQ issue

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: Tesla FAQ issue
• From: FutureT-at-aol-dot-com (by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>)
• Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 04:20:07 -0600
• Approved: twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net
• Delivered-To: fixup-tesla-at-pupman-dot-com-at-fixme

In a message dated 99-10-17 10:24:05 EDT, you write:

<< John and all,
 
> At this stage there's substantially more information available about how
> efficient TC's can be made, and I suspect there's also much better
> agreement about the theoretical aspects as well. There's certainly a lot
> of practical coil-building information that's available. As a starting
> point, I also recommend that we review Fr. Tom's document and update it
> where necessary. If there are certain areas that are not fully
> understood or where experimental evidence supports differing viewpoints
> (I'd suspect this would occur only in the more advanced areas), let's
 >simply simply acknowledge that. 

Bert, all,

What you say Bert is all very true.  Your many TC postings from the past
are also extremely valuable, well written, and clear.  I spoke about
Fr. Tom's work because he was specially working on the "Guide" as he
called it.  Of course a multitude of folks have written important and
excellent posts to the list over the years.

Someone mentioned gearing the FAQ towards the construction of
a specific TC design.  I like this idea, but the problem is that a 
builder might not be able to find the exact components.  To solve this
problem, plans for a number of differing TC designs could be presented,
along with the basic theory for those who want it, or want to build their
own TC design from scratch.

Cheers,
John Freau
 
> I'm willing to volunteer some quality time in this effort, and I know
> there are others on the list who will as well. We DO need a FAQ that we
> can point new coilers toward!

> -- Bert --
  >>

• Prev: Press Release
• Next: Re: flyback TC
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread