[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: bi-polar (center-fed) TC
The "two distinct secondaries" mentioned in my post are
exactly that: two DISTINCT secondaries. These are
usually both oriented vertically, as shown below:
Big Streamers between Toroids
O========O O========O Toroid
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | Secondary
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
pppppppp pppppppp Primary
pppppppp pppppppp
Streamers and arcs will establish themselves between
the two toroids. Sometimes this arrangement is
referred to as a "TWIN" coil arrangement. You can
get toroid-to-toroid strikes that are almost
double what you would get from a single coil.
Ed Wingate and others have built very impressive twin
coil systems.
Fr. Tom McGahee
----------
> From: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: bi-polar (center-fed) TC
> Date: Thursday, May 06, 1999 12:56 AM
>
> Original Poster: Parpp807-at-aol-dot-com
>
> In a message dated 5/2/99 6:31:48 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
> tesla-at-pupman-dot-com writes:
>
> <<original Poster: "Thomas McGahee" <tom_mcgahee-at-sigmais-dot-com>
>
> One problem that most experimenters building bipolar center-fed
> Tesla coils fail to take into consideration is the difficulty of
> adjusting the coupling. If you simply slide the primary more
> towards one side, you increase the coupling on one side and
> decrease it on the other side.
>
> If the experimenter fails to ground the secondary at its center,
> then approaching either of the ends will cause the voltage on the
> other end to change drastically. Quite often the circuit will
> respond by causing sparks to fly between the primary and the
> secondary at or near the center.
>
> For these reasons it is generally better to make a bipolar
> Tesla coil that uses two distinct secondaries having the bases
> both tied to a really good common FR ground. Such a bipolar
> Tesla coil will have separate primaries for each secondary.
> The coupling of each can be independently adjusted.
>
> The primaries
> have to be properly phased so that the tops of the two secondariness
> are out of phase. You can wind the secondariness in the same direction
> and the primaries in the same direction, and achieve proper
> phasing by just phasing the *connection* to the primary. There
> is NO need to wind any of the coils differently (although that is
> just as valid a method to achieve proper phasing).
>
> Hope this helps.
> Fr. Tom McGahee
>
> >>
> Tom,
> That is an interesting design for a di-pole TC, it's one that I have not
> previously seen.
> The center-tapped secondary will always have ends 180 degrees out-of-phase.
> Same
> for the two primaries which I guess are connected in series. From your
> experiments,
> just how critical is an accurate determination of the "electrical center
> line?" This design will also require a mechanical means for the lateral
> adjustment of the two primary
> windings.
>
> Ralph Zekelman
>