Re: irregular shaped secondary

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: irregular shaped secondary
• From: "D.C. Cox" <DR.RESONANCE-at-next-wave-dot-net> (by way of Terry Fritz <twf-at-verinet-dot-com>)
• Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 08:16:29 -0700
• Approved: twf-at-verinet-dot-com

to: Ron

If you do the physics, ie integrating the energy over the surface area, the
circle has the greatest area and therefore least corona.  This is why it
will work better than any structure where you force the energy to follow a
conductor with a sharp angle -- or even a small angle.

Dr.Resonance-at-next-wave-dot-net


----------
> From: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: irregular shaped secondary
> Date: Tuesday, January 26, 1999 4:59 AM
> 
> Original Poster: "RON QUIRING" <ronrenee-at-hotmail-dot-com> 
> 
> Just wondering if anyone has had any success with non tubular 
> secondaries, say octagon or higher?                                   
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail-dot-com
> 

• Prev: Re: Resonance
• Next: Re: Tesla Coil Operation - was "Harmonics"
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread