Re: 8-9 RFI noise thoughts. (comment on Medhurst)

To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: 8-9 RFI noise thoughts. (comment on Medhurst)
From: Bryan Kaufman <bryan-at-apexrad-dot-com> (by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>)
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 12:33:31 -0600
Approved: twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net
Delivered-To: fixup-tesla-at-pupman-dot-com-at-fixme

Sorry that should have read:

Given  that Co =  HD
Co = s(0.015L + 0.121D) in pf
in other words:
Co = *D(L + D/2)(0.015L + 0.121D) in pf

The Medhurst data reflect a surface area vs. volume curve.
Which makes perfect sense for a capacitor.

Tesla List wrote:
> 
> Original Poster: Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>
> 
> I think a simple relationship is extractable from the Medhurst data.
> After plotting the data the relationship is H/s = 0.015 L/D + 0.121 .
> This fits the Medhurst data with a correlation coefficient of .989,
> which by my last calculation is better than the original data.
> 
> This means that if Co = HD in pf then
> 
> Co = s(0.15L + 0.121D) in pf
> 
> where s is the surface area of the cylinder (including top and bottom
> surface areas)
> L is the length and D is the diameter.
> 
> Anybody want to check their coils?

-- 
   ,o888b.`?8888         Bryan L. Kaufman, MD, MS          8888P’,d888o.
 ,88888888   ?88 Vice President of Technology Development  88P’  88888888.
 8888888P’    88        Apex Radiology Incorporated        88    `?8888888
 888P’       .88     1999 N. University Ave. Suite 104     88        `?888
 `88        .d88       Coral Springs, Florida  33071       88b.        88’
   `?._  _.o8888      bryan-at-apexrad-dot-com 1.954.3451161      8888o._  _.P’