Re: Temperature to melt NST tar (fwd)

To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: Temperature to melt NST tar (fwd)
From: Tesla List <mod1-at-pupman-dot-com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 08:26:40 -0700 (MST)
Approved: mod1-at-pupman-dot-com



---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 1998 23:01:41 -0700
From: "D.C. Cox" <DR.RESONANCE-at-next-wave-dot-net>
To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Subject: Re: Temperature to melt NST tar (fwd)

to: Mike B.

NST are not really designed to do the best job.  Pick up a good 12 KV
potential xmfr and use a small series reactor on one of the primary legs. 
That will provide 160-200 ma continuous and they are nearly indestructable.

DR.RESONANCE-at-next-wave-dot-net


----------
> From: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: Temperature to melt NST tar (fwd)
> Date: Thursday, January 15, 1998 5:45 PM
> 
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 1998 14:48:34 -0800 (PST)
> From: baumann-at-proton.llumc.edu
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: Temperature to melt NST tar (fwd)
> 
> On 15 Jan, Tesla List wrote:
> 
> > On a side note, it's been my experience that FranceFormer brand has
been
> > statistically the ruggedest and least likely to fail of any of the
> > brands I've used for various purposes over the years- anyone else care
> > to put in their $0.02 worth?
> well.. mostly due to my own stupidity, I smoked a franceformer
> in less than 1 minute, yet the jefferson 12KV unit that I got used
> and beat-up, is still ticking just fine.
> 
> 
> -- 
> --
> Michael Baumann  Optivus Technology Inc.|Loma Linda University Medical
Center
> San Bernardino, California. (909)799-8308 |Internet: baumann-at-llumc.edu
>