Re: Arc Impedance Study - Computer Models

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: Arc Impedance Study - Computer Models
• From: "Sam Barros" <sambarros-at-hotmail-dot-com> (by way of Terry Fritz <terryf-at-verinet-dot-com>)
• Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1998 06:09:05 -0600
• Approved: terryf-at-verinet-dot-com

>Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1998 21:35:12 -0600
>To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
>Subject: Re: Arc Impedance Study - Computer Models
>From: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
>
>Original Poster: "D.C. Cox" <DR.RESONANCE-at-next-wave-dot-net> 
>
>to: Terry
>
>Nice post with clean, clear data.  Your 1" sec elevation is very close 
to
>my usual recommendations of 1 to 1 1/2 inches above the plane of the 
pri
>coil for bottom turn of sec coil.  Any coiler running a 20 to 24 inch 
dia
>coil will find 7 to 9 inch elevation of sec coil above the primary 
plane
>works best.


  ???!!! I always thought that the primary's first turn had to be 
leveled with the secondary's first turn!
 I am quite sure I read it somewhere... Can someone shine a light into 
this matter???


 Sam Barros.

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail-dot-com

• Prev: BL IN TC ARCS PHOTOS!
• Next: Re: My extended-foil cap failed
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread