Re: Magnifier Report

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: Magnifier Report
• From: FutureT-at-aol-dot-com (by way of Terry Fritz <terryf-at-verinet-dot-com>)
• Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1998 17:07:57 -0600
• Approved: terryf-at-verinet-dot-com

In a message dated 98-10-09 00:07:09 EDT, you write:

<< > positioning the low voltage node at the base of the extra coil.  This
> > tends to help the coil's performance also.
> > 
 >> John Freau
 
> In essence, it sounds much like a 2-coil system (nodes at the same 
 >places). Has he compared this setup with a two coil system set to the 
> same Ksys run under the same drive conditions?
 
> Malcolm >>

Malcolm,

This is another thing that Lou plans to test.  (In this magnifier set-up,
one wonders what purpose the secondary is serving, other than
physical separation aspects?) 

John Freau

• Prev: Re: Toroid = shorted turn ?
• Next: Re: Toroid = shorted turn ?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread