[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: RF biological hazards? (fwd)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 03 May 1998 09:00:41 -0500
From: Bert Pool <bertpool-at-ticnet-dot-com>
To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Subject: Re: RF biological hazards? (fwd)
Tesla List wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Sat, 2 May 1998 10:34:59 EDT
> From: Homer Lea <HomerLea-at-aol-dot-com>
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: RF biological hazards? (fwd)
>
> In a message dated 5/1/98 7:38:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time, tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> writes:
>
> > > that "skin depth" in people was several tens of cm at a few MHz,
>
> I have always taken "several" to be at least 4 so we are talking about 16
> inches or more. Sounds like more than the thickness of most bodies?????
>
> jim heagy
Jim, my body approaches that 16 inch depth an inch or so every year I get
older. Does this mean in a few years I'll be a "safer" biological thickness?
<grin>.
Bert