Re: Testing caps -> NST protection (fwd)

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: Testing caps -> NST protection (fwd)
• From: Tesla List <mod1-at-pupman-dot-com>
• Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 21:15:11 -0600 (MDT)
• Approved: mod1-at-pupman-dot-com

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 19:57:18 -0600
From: terryf-at-verinet-dot-com
To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Subject: Re: Testing caps -> NST protection (fwd)

At 08:56 PM 7/29/98 -0600, you wrote:
>From: "D.C. Cox" <DR.RESONANCE-at-next-wave-dot-net>
>To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
>Subject: Re: Testing caps -> NST protection (fwd)
>
>to: Terry, Malcolm
>
>This 2xErms value sounds very suspiciously like a blum line device ---
>characteristic with cap value and very low inductance value producing 2E at
>the other end --- pehaps at the safety gap area if the values are just
>right for true blum line effects.
>
>DR.RESONANCE-at-next-wave-dot-net
>
>
SNIP>>>>>>>>>>

        I am unfamiliar with the blum line device and effects.  Could you
explain more or direct me to more information on this??

        Terry Fritz

• Prev: RE>p6015 HV insulating freo (fwd)
• Next: BHVL Books (fwd)
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread