[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Frequency change from due to arcs (fwd)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 1998 18:37:13 -0400
From: Richard Hull <rhull-at-richmond.infi-dot-net>
To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Subject: Re: Frequency change from due to arcs (fwd)
Tesla List wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Sat, 18 Jul 1998 16:03:31 -0600
> From: terryf-at-verinet-dot-com
> To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> Subject: Frequency change from due to arcs
>
> Hi Antonio
>
> I have been playing with this model. How about a capacitor in
> parallel instead of series. Seems to work much better. I have found by
> modeling, here in my cushy armchair :-), that resistance alone cannot
> account for the frequency shift. There definitely is added capacitance from
> streamers at work! The model suggests that the capacitance should be in
> parallel. This makes since to me when I think about the physical situation.
>
>
> Terry Fritz
The ion load capacity is always in parallel- top load to ground. Resonantly, it
is viewed as part of the series resonant circuit, however, that is, as part of
Ctop
Richard Hull, TCBOR.
Richard Hull