Re: Frequency change from due to arcs (fwd)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 1998 18:37:13 -0400
From: Richard Hull <rhull-at-richmond.infi-dot-net>
To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Subject: Re: Frequency change from due to arcs (fwd)

Tesla List wrote:

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Sat, 18 Jul 1998 16:03:31 -0600
> From: terryf-at-verinet-dot-com
> To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> Subject: Frequency change from due to arcs
> Hi Antonio
>         I have been playing with this model.  How about a capacitor in
> parallel instead of series.  Seems to work much better.  I have found by
> modeling, here in my cushy armchair :-), that resistance alone cannot
> account for the frequency shift.  There definitely is added capacitance from
> streamers at work!  The model suggests that the capacitance should be in
> parallel.  This makes since to me when I think about the physical situation.
>         Terry Fritz

The ion load capacity is always in parallel-  top load to ground.  Resonantly, it
is viewed as part of the series resonant circuit, however, that is, as part of

Richard Hull, TCBOR.

Richard Hull