Re: Electrum output impedance (fwd)

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: Electrum output impedance (fwd)
• From: Tesla List <mod1-at-pupman-dot-com>
• Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 21:52:19 -0600 (MDT)
• Approved: mod1-at-pupman-dot-com

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 09:00:41 +1200
From: Malcolm Watts <MALCOLM-at-directorate.wnp.ac.nz>
To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Subject: Re: Electrum output impedance (fwd)

Commenting further.....

> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 01:00:42 -0700
> From: lod-at-pacbell-dot-net
> To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> Subject: Re: Electrum output impedance (fwd)
> 
> > > Yes, probably much brighter and somewhat shorter, and if
> > > carried to extremes, might approach the performance of
> > > tube coils.
> > > -GL
> > 
> > I was presupposing that the prim/sec inductance ratio was maintained.
> > 
> > ?
> > Malcolm
> 
> Then the Zpri would necessarily drop into very lossy territory.
> It's usually already on the edge.
> -- 
> 
> 
> -GL
> www.lod-dot-org

Yes, I had considered that and would be reluctant to let the lower 
Zpri drop much below 15 Ohms.

M

• Prev: RE>Re: How to rise the seco (fwd)
• Next: Re: How to rise the secondary? (fwd)
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread