[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Magnifier vs Classical TC
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 1997 16:08:14 -0500
From: "DR.RESONANCE" <DR.RESONANCE-at-next-wave-dot-net>
To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Subject: Re: Magnifier vs Classical TC
Hi John:
I would suspect because a magnifier allows tighter coupling which allows
for more energy to be coupled into the secondary inductor without frequency
splitting -- a real nuisance in a classic circuit. More available energy
in the resonant circuit (transmitted to the sec circuit not gained) should
provide for a greater transmission distance. David Sloan's papers cover
this effect very well. He achieved a 100 kw output with 150 kw input in an
18 turn secondary inductor -- water cooled copper tubing in a tank with
capacitive coupling to the tank wall.
DR.RESONANCE-at-next-wave-dot-net
----------
> From: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Magnifier vs Classical TC
> Date: Sunday,October 12,1997 12:58 PM
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Sun, 12 Oct 1997 06:59:32 +0000
> From: "John H. Couture" <couturejh-at-worldnet.att-dot-net>
> To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> Subject: Magnifier vs Classical TC
>
>
> Note that the magnifier is capable of magnifing power and maybe give a
> longer spark compared to a classical TC for the same watt second input.
>
> However, the magnifier cannot magnify energy. This means that the
> magnifier would not be able to increase a controlled spark length
compared
> to a classical TC without increasing the watt second input??
>
> Why would Tesla want the magnifier for his world electrical system?
>
> John Couture