[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A "Revolutionary" Idea
Subject:
Re: A "Revolutionary" Idea
Date:
Fri, 21 Mar 1997 21:05:32 -0700
From:
"DR.RESONANCE" <DR.RESONANCE-at-next-wave-dot-net>
To:
"Tesla List" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
to: Joe Cummings
Yes -- we did the experiment you mentioned. We used 10 electrodes and
had
a gap above and below each electrode. Connected them all in series for
a
total of 20 series gaps on a 12 inch rotary disk running on a variable
speed DC drive motor.
It worked very poorly on both small and large coils. It was
over-quenching
and reduced the output considerably as compared to a normal 4 gap
rotary.
It did work very well on a tightly coupled (0.6) magnifier type coil
system
such as the type R. Hull is running.
We concluded is wasn't a great idea unless you are running a very
tightly
coupled system in a true resonance transformer mode operation.
DR.RESONANCE-at-next-wave-dot-net
----------
> From: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> To: tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com
> Subject: A "Revolutionary" Idea
> Date: Friday,March 21,1997 11:21 PM
>
> Subject:
> A "Revolutionary" Idea
> Date:
> Fri, 21 Mar 1997 13:27:05 GMT
> From:
> Joe Cummings <joecmn-at-globalnet.co.uk>
> To:
> tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
>
>
> At present I'm not able to do any practical work, so all I do is carry
> out
> Gedankenforschungen - thought experiments.
>
> I have an idea about rotary spark gaps that, knowing the amount of
> expertise
> to be found on this list, I'm sure has been dealt with before. Anyway,
> I'll
> float it.
>
> I assume a rotary S.G. has an electrode on the rotor, which, as it
> rotates
> comes opposite one or more electrodes on the stator, so to get more
> frequent
> sparks, the rotor has to be accelerated.
>
> Now, has anyone tried staggering a number of electrodes on the rotor, so
> that there
>
> is more than one spark per rev, or x sparks per rev, depending on the
> number of electrodes on the stator?
>
> Let's build a rotary with six static electrodes, and five on the rotor.
> Let
> us space the electrodes on the rotor using a compass, set, not at the
> radius, but at the length of the radius plus one fifth the length of the
> radius. Let's call the stator elctrodes S1,S2,etc., and the rotary
> electrodes R1,R2,etc.
>
> Now starting with R1 and S1 sparking opposite each other, after a fifth
> times a sixth of a revolution, R2 and S2 are sparking, and after another
> thirtieth of a rev., R3 and S3 are sparking and so on. This will mean
> that
> there are thirty sparks per revolution.
>
> Is this a feasible proposition? If so, then it could be worked out for
> any
> number of
> electrodes.