[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
??? maybe a ridiculous idea???
From: William Noble[SMTP:William_B_Noble-at-msn-dot-com]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 1997 9:23 PM
To: Tesla List
Subject: ??? maybe a ridiculous idea???
why can't a tesla coil be torroidal - for a small coil this could be wound on
a heavily insulated bobbin - it the most efficient way of coupling all the
flux from one coil to another.... maybe a flyback transformer type
arrangement like I see for the transistorized tesla coils can be scaled up to
500 w to 1 or 2 KW???
SNIP
If an unloaded Q of <100 would suffice, then it seems that the
space-wound geometry with a small toroid would be the best approach,
in order to achieve a lower L/C at the lowest cost. Why add extra turns
to the sec, if doing so only forces the addition of a larger toroid to
compensate? The extra turns do not add extra voltage.
-GL
>From tesla-at-stic-dot-net Sun Jun 22 08:43:55 1997
Received: from mail.stic-dot-net (mail.stic-dot-net [204.57.118.5])
by poodle.pupman-dot-com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA06077
for <tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>; Sun, 22 Jun 1997 08:43:49 -0600
Received: from sa1-022.stic-dot-net ([204.57.113.232]) by mail.stic-dot-net
(post.office MTA v2.0 0813 ID# 0-10265) with SMTP id AAA326
for <tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>; Sun, 22 Jun 1997 09:43:41 -0500
Received: by sa1-022.stic-dot-net with Microsoft Mail
id <01BC7EF0.A1CF4EE0-at-sa1-022.stic-dot-net>; Sun, 22 Jun 1997 09:42:43 -0500
Message-ID: <01BC7EF0.A1CF4EE0-at-sa1-022.stic-dot-net>
From: Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>
To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>
Subject: ??? maybe a ridiculous idea???
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 1997 09:40:17 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: William Noble[SMTP:William_B_Noble-at-msn-dot-com]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 1997 9:23 PM
To: Tesla List
Subject: ??? maybe a ridiculous idea???
why can't a tesla coil be torroidal - for a small coil this could be wound on
a heavily insulated bobbin - it the most efficient way of coupling all the
flux from one coil to another.... maybe a flyback transformer type
arrangement like I see for the transistorized tesla coils can be scaled up to
500 w to 1 or 2 KW???
SNIP
If an unloaded Q of <100 would suffice, then it seems that the
space-wound geometry with a small toroid would be the best approach,
in order to achieve a lower L/C at the lowest cost. Why add extra turns
to the sec, if doing so only forces the addition of a larger toroid to
compensate? The extra turns do not add extra voltage.
-GL