Re: Skin Effect 2

• To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>
• Subject: Re: Skin Effect 2
• From: Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>
• Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 08:18:17 -0500
• Approved: tesla-at-stic-dot-net

From: 	FutureT-at-aol-dot-com[SMTP:FutureT-at-aol-dot-com]
Sent: 	Thursday, July 31, 1997 3:12 AM
To: 	tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: 	Re: Skin Effect 2

> I know skin effect exists but I can not prove it is useful in TC building.
>snip> Have I missed something?  What good is skin effect?  
> snip>Next compare skin effect to magnetic field flux density.  Which
> one increases spark output the most?  Its not skin effect.
  
 > Gary Weaver 
  >>

Gary,

Skin effect is not helpful to the performance of a TC.  It limits the 
current that can pass through a certain sized conductor, increases
losses, and forces us to use larger conductors than we would need
if skin effect didn't exist. 

John Freau

• Prev: HF sparks
• Next: Re: Conditions for opt. loading, was: In vs. Out
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread