Re: Tube magnifiers, was: In vs. Out [small magnefier ]

To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>
Subject: Re: Tube magnifiers, was: In vs. Out [small magnefier ]
From: Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 03:40:25 -0500
Approved: tesla-at-stic-dot-net

From: 	FutureT-at-aol-dot-com[SMTP:FutureT-at-aol-dot-com]
Sent: 	Tuesday, July 22, 1997 12:18 PM
To: 	tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: 	Re: Tube magnifiers, was: In vs. Out [small magnefier ]

In a message dated 97-07-22 12:30:45 EDT, you write:

<< To: John Freau

> Thanks for the data.  With the present workload we probably won't get at
> this project until sometime in August or Sept.   Any data you might have
> would be helpful.  

> DR.RESONANCE-at-next-wave-dot-net
  >>

DR. R,

I sent some data on a larger system in another post, but I like Richard 
Hull's suggestion of using a radar pulser circuit to drive the system.  
Regular tube magnifiers seem incapable of outperforming a regular tube
coil, so any project of this type would seem useful only from a novelty
point of view.  It is of course possible that my designs were sub-optimal
and that better performance can be coaxed from such a TC.

In any case, good luck with the project.

John Freau