Re: Optimal Quenching Tests

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: Optimal Quenching Tests
• From: Richard Hull <hullr-at-whitlock-dot-com>
• Date: Thu, 02 Jan 1997 16:23:34 -0800
• Subscriber: hullr-at-whitlock-dot-com Thu Jan 2 22:53:25 1997

Tesla List wrote:
> 
> Subscriber: ed-at-alumni.caltech.edu Sun Dec 22 20:27:06 1996
> Date: Sun, 22 Dec 1996 17:16:30 -0800 (PST)
> From: "Edward V. Phillips" <ed-at-alumni.caltech.edu>
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: Optimal Quenching Tests
> 
> Re: "Fast quenching"
>         The benefits were thoroughly understood back in spark
> transmitter days: they called it "impulse excitation" anede
> and advantages cited were tighter allowable coupling to the
> antenna circuit and avoidance of a "double wave".
> Ed


All,

Again, these old accepted and recognised "benefits" mentioned above are 
for radio work, viewed from a radio enginering perspective, and may or 
maynot impact us as coilers or our spark length.

Richard Hull, TCBOR

• Prev: Re: chokes
• Next: Behr Super-Build 50
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread