Re: Top Toroid

To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: Top Toroid
From: richard hull <rhull-at-richmond.infi-dot-net>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1997 00:17:40 -0500 (EST)
Subscriber: rhull-at-richmond.infi-dot-net Wed Feb 12 23:10:52 1997

At 11:26 PM 2/11/97 -0700, you wrote:
>Subscriber: Esondrmn-at-aol-dot-com Tue Feb 11 23:12:17 1997
>Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 16:56:13 -0500 (EST)
>From: Esondrmn-at-aol-dot-com
>To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
>Subject: Re: Top Toroid
>
>In a message dated 97-02-11 01:09:33 EST, you write:
>
><< [snip]
>  
> > A question for Richard Hull, if 400 to 600 bps is what you see from
> > experience as a good general number, why does this coil want higher and
> > higher rpm?
> > 
> > Comments anyone?
> 
> 
> Ed,
> 
> Because a higher rpm results in increased output power, which is always
>good.
> 
> -GL
>  >>
>Greg,
>
>Part of my original reason behind my discussion was to see if anyone thought
>the high break rate was maybe a cause of the commercial Condenser Products
>cap failure.  I didn't get much feedback on that idea.
>
>Ed Sonderman
>
>
Ed,  

Sorry 'bout that.  Yes, high break rates at high impulse levels chew into
capacitor lifetimes like a buzz saw.  Only the strong (read- very expensive)
survive!

Richard Hull, TCBOR