Re: Gap Losses

From: 	richard hull[SMTP:rhull-at-richmond.infi-dot-net]
Sent: 	Thursday, August 28, 1997 7:06 PM
To: 	Tesla List
Subject: 	Re: Gap Losses

At 01:21 AM 8/28/97 -0500, you wrote:
>From: 	Greg Leyh[SMTP:lod-at-pacbell-dot-net]
>Sent: 	Thursday, August 28, 1997 1:39 AM
>To: 	Tesla List
>Subject: 	Re: Gap Losses
>Richard Hull wrote:

>> Probably, it is more of safe range for someone wanting a quick and dirty
>> generalization that won't get them in trouble when designing and building an
>> important system which has got to work out of the chute.  Ideally, of
>> course, tweaking and dinkin' with the system after construction will improve
>> the performance. (perhaps by even adding or subtracting gaps!)
Greg wrote;

>At this point, I am definitely doing everything possible from the 'armchair'
>point of view so that the coil might work 'out of the chute', since even the
>simplest jobs, like changing the toroid, will require renting construction
>equipment a week in advance.

  Yes.  I keep forgetting the tonnage involved in your system!  Definitely
out of the chute excellence would be highly desirable.  Dinkin' around over
10KW can be like Russian Roulette.

Richard Hull, TCBOR