Re: Gap Losses

• To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>
• Subject: Re: Gap Losses
• From: Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>
• Date: Fri, 29 Aug 1997 01:34:17 -0500
• Approved: tesla-at-stic-dot-net

From: 	Greg Leyh[SMTP:lod-at-pacbell-dot-net]
Sent: 	Thursday, August 28, 1997 4:39 PM
To: 	Tesla List
Subject: 	Re: Gap Losses

Malcolm Watts wrote:

(regarding optimum Zchar)
> Since I have the opportunity, I decided it would be a good idea to at
> least find out whether there was a significant benefit over 50 Ohms
> at the 200W-odd level. I may be forced to reduce this to use a bigger
> primary cap to get more bang at reduced BPS anyway. 

Or higher Vpri?  I suppose that Vpri is often limited by materials on hand.

>     BTW, the same guy is now asking for a second and considerably
> more powerful one. He was initially interested in <= 2 foot
> because of space considerations. Time to roll up the sleeves at last
> :)

Sounds like a good reason to finish that switching cap charger...


-GL

• Prev: toriods
• Next: Re: Gap Losses
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread