Re: FW: Gap Losses

• To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>
• Subject: Re: FW: Gap Losses
• From: Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>
• Date: Tue, 26 Aug 1997 23:01:15 -0500
• Approved: tesla-at-stic-dot-net

From: 	Greg Leyh[SMTP:lod-at-pacbell-dot-net]
Sent: 	Tuesday, August 26, 1997 2:27 AM
To: 	Tesla List
Subject: 	Re: FW: Gap Losses

Richard Hull wrote:


> As regards what is the optimum surge impedance..... I honestly believe it is
> like everything else in this messy business...firmly planted in ever
> shifting sand.
> 
> It is part of the art.
> 
> A question to your question what is really high? ...Low?  It is as much
> power related (relates to frequency too) as to some magic number. You
> effectively said this earlier.

In your travels, have you ever come across any mention of actual resistance
msmts made on a TC rotary gap?


-GL

• Prev: Re: DC power supply again
• Next: Re: Gap Losses
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread