[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: earth resonance
Tesla List wrote:
>
> >From ed-at-alumni.caltech.eduWed Sep 4 22:32:22 1996
> Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 19:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
> From: "Edward V. Phillips" <ed-at-alumni.caltech.edu>
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: earth resonance
>
> "Which laws of physics would be violated upon producing an
> 8/16 hz wave?
> "
> Resonance of a coil of the size he could build at
> Wardenclyfe (sp?) and load with the big structure on top
> of his tower. IF one could build a suitable resonator and
> excite it with enough power, one night get something going
> in the way of exciting the earth as a spherical resonator,
> but those are mighty big if's.
>
> Tesla clearly knew how to design a resonating system,
> as the calculations in his CSN show. Has anyone ever found
> any of his calculations directed toward designing such a low
> frequency system?
> Ed Phillips
Ed,
That an absolute NO! Tesla had plans for Wardenclyffe to be in the 20KHZ
range. This was the frequency range he opted for best transmission of
power. Again, the Corum tell of how the real power launch at the low
frequencies specified 6-8 Hz are to be created. The ultra high
power 30khz and below signal in the cavity was to be phased so that as
the energy in the cavity rose is successive trips within the cavity it
would form powerful beats at the 6-8HZ range. Tesla notes that the low
frequency of his system (20KHZ) was needed to provide a low loss power
input to excite the cavity. He further notes that above 30Khz too much
energy is loss in the "medium". This is all theoretically possible and
the Corums note that a good 2KW amateur transmitter re-tuned to this low
range and phased right "might prove the efficacy of this concept. (see
their Symposia papers for more detailed specifics) I have never heard of
them or anyone else doing this though. Lotsa' ifs and maybes.
Personally, I am currently not very interested in the subject either.
Other fish to fry, you know.
Richard Hull, TCBOR