Re: Arc length vs pwrRe: Arc length vs pwrRE: Arc length vs pwrRe: Arc length vs pwr

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: Arc length vs pwrRe: Arc length vs pwrRE: Arc length vs pwrRe: Arc length vs pwr
• From: GE Leyh <lod-at-pacbell-dot-net>
• Date: Sun, 08 Oct 1995 19:52:47 +0000

John Couture wrote:

> I ran your new info thru the JHCTES computer program. For 120 volts, 14 amps
> = 1680 watts input with a 19.0 mh secondary the program shows 640 watts per
> foot of spark and an overall efficiency of 31.2%. Your coil appears to be
> similar to a typical coil with this new wattage.


Can you tell me where the 640 Watts per foot value comes from?  Seems intuitive,
but I wonder how well it scales up.

-GL

• Next: Re: Tank frequency
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread