Re: The "T" word

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: The "T" word
• From: Bert Hickman <bert.hickman-at-aquila-dot-com>
• Date: Tue, 15 Oct 1996 07:05:24 -0700

Tesla List wrote:
> 
> >From rwstephens-at-ptbo.igs-dot-netMon Oct 14 21:19:22 1996
> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 11:53:22 -0500
> From: "Robert W. Stephens" <rwstephens-at-ptbo.igs-dot-net>
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: The "T" word
> 
> >>From lod-at-pacbell-dot-netSun Oct 13 22:03:11 1996
> >Date: Thu, 12 Oct 1995 20:51:08 +0000
> >From: GE Leyh <lod-at-pacbell-dot-net>
> >To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> >Subject: The "T" word
> 
> >Hi All,
> 
> >I feel the need to show some support for Theory at this point,
> >for all of those out there that see it as a diversion from
> >performing 'real work'.
> >
<SNIP>
> 
> Greg,
> 
<SNIP>
> 
> Thank you Greg for your own meritorious pioneering contribution in this arena.
> I commend you on your own fine project and an excellent paper documenting
> it.
> 
> rwstephens

Greg,

How can I get a copy of the paper referenced above?  Thanks in advance!


-- Bert --

• Prev: Re: First post: Fluorescent lighting
• Next: Re: First post: Fluorescent lighting
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread