[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Frequency Split
-
To: tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com
-
Subject: Re: Frequency Split
-
From: "Malcolm Watts" <MALCOLM-at-directorate.wnp.ac.nz>
-
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 09:49:59 +1200
-
>Received: from rata.vuw.ac.nz (root-at-rata.vuw.ac.nz [130.195.2.11]) by uucp-1.csn-dot-net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA14514 for <tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com>; Mon, 18 Mar 1996 14:50:16 -0700
A slight addition to my post on this...
> > 1. Why are you calling these K values sweet?
> > Because they couple in an integer number of
> > cycles?
>
> The maximum amplitude of the two frequencies coincide in the secondary
> when these values of k are used.
I didn't make it clear that the maxima coicidence is an _in-phase_
coincidence. Of course the out-of-phase maxima coincidence is when
the energy is entirely in the primary circuit.
Sorry,
Malcolm