Re: Voltage Reversal of Pulse Caps

To: tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com, KLINEDA-at-univscvm.csd.scarolina.edu, QUANTUM-at-univscvm.csd.scarolina.edu, WMEYER-at-scientia.up.ac.za, bhaley-at-shore-dot-net, frerichs-at-zfe.siemens.de, froula-at-cig.mot-dot-com, haba-at-snakemail.hut.fi, jetter-at-ix-dot-netcom-dot-com, scott-at-csustan.csustan.edu
Subject: Re: Voltage Reversal of Pulse Caps
From: Esondrmn-at-aol-dot-com
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 13:06:32 -0500
>Received: from mail04.mail.aol-dot-com (mail04.mail.aol-dot-com [152.163.172.53]) by uucp-1.csn-dot-net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA27110 for <tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com>; Tue, 28 Nov 1995 11:09:35 -0700

In a message dated 95-11-28 04:02:41 EST, tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com writes:

>Now, someone posted much higher figures on the shot life ratings of these
>caps.
>I don't remember who it was.  It could have been Ed Sonderman.  Was it you
>Ed?
>These shot life figures are open for interpretation.  I am awaiting a call
>from
>Condenser Products now to discuss this matter further.  We don't really use
>them
>the way that this test indicates.  I'll let you know of my findings.
>
>

Scott,

Yes, I did reply on this a week or two ago.  I believe the number they gave
me was 3.5 x 10 to the 12th for shot life.

Ed Sonderman