[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Cap dielectric
-
To: tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com
-
Subject: Re: Cap dielectric
-
From: "SROYS" <SROYS-at-radiology.ab.umd.edu>
-
Date: Thu, 4 May 1995 09:31:11 EDT
-
>Received: from ns-1.csn-dot-net (root-at-ns-1.csn-dot-net [199.117.27.21]) by uucp-1.csn-dot-net (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id HAA14882 for <tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com>; Thu, 4 May 1995 07:31:16 -0600
In my previous post, my mind was thinking polyethylene but my fingers
were typing polypropylene when I was talking about the "ideal"
capacitor dielectric. Polypropylene is also good for coil contruction
(low loss, high dielectric strength, etc...), but the "state-of-the-art" in
home-built pulse capacitors seems to be rolled polyethylene caps (R.
Hull, R. Quick). The low density polyethylene sheet you can buy from
your local plastic dealer has good dielectric strength, low RF losses,
and is relatively inexpensive and easily obtainable. Large mica caps
are expensive and from R. Hull's experience (reported in the TCBA
newsletter), they ran warm while his rolled polyethylene caps stayed
cool (higher losses in the micas?). Glass is also lossy, bulky, heavy,
and breaks easily. The best thing about glass is that it's so cheap and
ubiquitous, a salt-water capacitor bank can be made for practically
nothing.
Steven Roys (sroys-at-radiology.ab.umd.edu)