Hi Jeff,One comment comes to mind regarding the 55' claim. Others have already mentioned that the 55' point-to-point arc is not visible in the specific photo you mentioned earlier. ( http://www.ttr.com/model13.html )
To quantify point-to-point arc length in that photo, I applied the same measurement technique that I used on the Electrum photo:
http://www.lightninglab.org/misc/M13ArcMsmt.jpgApplying the 6' human from the double exposure shown below this photo, it seems that a circle on the ground only 24' from the breakout points is able to fully contain all of the ground strikes. None of the arcs appear to even come close the projected 55' length on the photo. Perhaps there's another photo that better illustrates the 55' point to point performance? At the least, the caption for that specific photo should probably be revised.
-GL ---- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff W. Parisse" <workshop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The 13M by Bill Wysock made verified 55' arcs - point to point - photographed and measured by 3rd parties.Greg will probably comment soon on the 55-60' claim.The two China coils are fiberglass versions of the 13M and with the vastly improved gap design should exceed 60' each. The coils MAY be run someday (not by us - we are DONE with that client). 150kW eachJeff----- Original Message -----> Did the Chinese ever spin that coil up [for the Olympics] after treated > Jeff so shabbily? > > -- thanks, Dave > > In a message dated 5/14/2009 5:37:35 A.M. Mountain Daylight Time, > resonance@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes: > > The Electrum coil was producing 55 to 60 ft long sparks at 130 kVA. > > I have a large one in Australia, running at 150 kVA, class RSG type, 8 ft > dia x 42 ft tall, produces 78 ft sparks. > > Jeff P.'s large coil I think runs at 200 kVA and produces 120 ft long > sparks (the China coil). I don't know if they set it up and tested it > prior to shipping or not. > > Dr. Resonance
_______________________________________________ Tesla mailing list Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla