[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Vortex gap loss measurements
Hi Jim:
I've not thought this all the way through but I'm guessing that the reason
for the non-logarithmic decrement is a non-linear arc resistance. If the
arc resistance went down as the current went up, would it yield what I
observed? If so, it's still remarkable that it was non-linear in such a way
to produce a linear result!
Regards, Gary Lau
Waltham, MA USA
-----Original Message-----
From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla-at-pupman-dot-com]
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2000 5:22 PM
To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: Vortex gap loss measurements
Original poster: "Jim Lux" <jimlux-at-jpl.nasa.gov>
You might also get a linear decrement if your gap is acting
as a constant
voltage drop instead of a constant resistance. A resistance
would give a
log decrement, in the classic RLC circuit.
----------
> From: Tesla list <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: RE: Vortex gap loss measurements
> Date: Saturday, September 02, 2000 12:48 PM
>
> Original poster: "John H. Couture"
<couturejh-at-worldnet.att-dot-net>
>
>
> Gary -
>
> Many thanks for providing us with your test data. More of
this type of
test
> information is needed because there are still many secrets
of TC
operation
> we need to know.
>
> You mentioned that at times the dampened wave appeared to
be logarithmic.
I
> found this to be true in some of my tests using a standard
scope.
However,
> the traces were very irregular. Could it be that the
storage scope is
> affecting the results by sampling more than one trace?
>
> John Couture
>
> ---------------------------
>
> ---Original Message-----
> From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla-at-pupman-dot-com]
> Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 6:17 PM
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Vortex gap loss measurements
>
>
> Original poster: "Lau, Gary" <Gary.Lau-at-compaq-dot-com>
>
> Today I found some time and performed a comparison between
the gap losses
of
> my single vacuum gap, and my new single vortex gap. To do
so, I scoped
the
> primary ringdown with no secondary in place. I used a
Terry Fritz fiber
> optic voltage probe across the primary coil and a digital
storage scope
to
> record the results. I have not yet accurately calibrated
the voltage
> readout, so for now, the results are just relative to each
other.
>
> With no secondary in place, the ringdown is a linearly
decrementing
> waveform, not logarithmic. As such, the slope of the
ringdown indicates
the
> losses in the circuit and is independent of the gap firing
voltage. I
> performed ringdown slope measurements at a variety of gap
widths to vary
the
> initial voltage, but the ringdown slope is a constant,
independent of
Vgap.
>
> The power to the blower motor is varied through a lamp
dimmer and I tried
> varying the motor speed to see what effect that had. At
very low speed,
the
> linearly decrementing waveform became slightly
logarithmic-looking, but
> still predominantly linear. The gap breakdown voltage
appeared to change
> slightly at low speed, but this was hard to measure as it
was slight and
the
> bang-to-bang gap breakdown voltage is not as consistent as
one might
hope.
>
> The slope decrement figures are assuming that my probe is
accurately
> calibrated for voltage, though I suspect it may not be, so
the figures
are
> useful only for relative comparison purposes.
> The pressurized vortex gap decremented at 200V/usec.
> The vacuum gap decremented at 235V/usec (17.5% faster).
> The vortex gap breakdown voltage is about 20% higher than
the vacuum gap
at
> the same gap distance.
>
> Vortex gap web page:
>
> http://people.ne.mediaone-dot-net/lau/tesla/vortexgap.htm
>
> <http://people.ne.mediaone-dot-net/lau/tesla/vortexgap.htm>
> Vacuum gap web page:
>
> http://people.ne.mediaone-dot-net/lau/tesla/onegap.htm
>
> <http://people.ne.mediaone-dot-net/lau/tesla/onegap.htm>
>
> Regards, Gary Lau
> Waltham, MA USA
>
>
>
>
>
>