[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Optimal toroid elevation
-
To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
-
Subject: Re: Optimal toroid elevation
-
From: Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>
-
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 19:21:16 -0600
-
Approved: twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net
-
Delivered-To: fixup-tesla-at-pupman-dot-com-at-fixme
-
In-Reply-To: <C22568E9.002BBF3A.00-at-notesmail.tellabs.fi>
Hi Marco,
For my coils, I used E-Tesla5 to plot the E-fields around my coil. I then
looked at these fields and the stresses involved to try and determine a
"smooth and happy" field pattern around the coil and the terminal. I know
there is a lot of guess work and armwaving with this but looking at the
fields does give one an idea if the terminal so too high or not. E-Tesla5
can also model a corona ring and such...
Cheers,
Terry
At 10:43 AM 5/24/00 +0300, you wrote:
>Hello all.
>
>Can anybody please give me some hints about how much should be the distance
>between the top of the secondary coil and the middle point of the toroid for
>the
>Thor coil?
>
>The Thor secondary is 70" tall, winding is 59" long (about 4" left between top
>turn and top of the secondary form).
>
>The toroid is 59" outer diameter, the aluminium duct used is 7.9" diameter.
>
>I thought to rise the toroid about 15" - 20 " over the secondary top: any
>comments about that?
>
>Should I use also an anti-corona smaller toroid near to the last top secondary
>turn?
>
>Regards
>
>
>