[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Tesla's Wireless Power Transmission ==> was Re: Non-tech Qu
DEAR DISCUSSANTS,
I WOULD BE SURPRISED IF IT COULD BE SHOWN THAT THE ONE OVER R SQUARED LAW
COULD BE BROKEN - IT FLIES IN THE FACE OF EVERYTHING I'VE EVER LEARNED
ABOUT, FOR EXAMPLE, FARADAY'S "ELECTRODYNAMICS", ETC. THESE QUANTITATIVE
RELATIONSHIPS AREN'T PARCELLED OUT TO THIS PHENOMENON HERE AND THAT LITTLE
PHENOMENON THERE - THE ONE/R SQRD LAW HAS AN IMMUTABLE CHARACTER, WOVEN
RIGHT INTO THE FABRIC OF SPACE-TIME-GRAVITY-ENERGETIC MANIFOLDS IN THESE
REGARDS! IT HOLDS THROUGH FARADAY, LORENZIAN, EINSTEINIAN,
SUPERSTRING/SUPERSYMMETRY THEORIZATION, AND GOOD OLD NEWTONIAN MECHANICS.
CORRECT ME IF I ERR, PLEASE. NOAH
MY APOLOGIES IF THIS IS COMING OUT IN BIG BOLD LETTERS, I'M HAVING SOME FONT
TROUBLES!
Original Message -----
From: "Tesla List" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
To: <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2000 6:00 PM
Subject: Re: Tesla's Wireless Power Transmission ==> was Re: Non-tech Qu
> Original Poster: "Thomas McGahee" <tom_mcgahee-at-sigmais-dot-com>
>
> My response to Bill Wysock is:
> RIGHT ON!
>
> For those who do not agree, please take the time to read Tesla's
> OWN account of what he was trying to achieve. It can be found in
> the book "Nikola Tesla On His Work With Alternating Currents and
> Their Application to Wireless Telegraphy, Telephony, and
> Transmission Of Power" Edited by Leland I. Anderson, published
> by Sun Publishing, Denver Colorado. I purchased my copy from the
> Tesla Book Company, PO Box 121873 Chula Vista, CA 91912 phone number
> 1-800-393-2056. The book was published in 1992 and is about 200 pages
> long.
>
> This book is not ABOUT Tesla: It is a TRANSCRIPT of a pre-hearing
> interview between Tesla and his legal counsel in 1916. Read it and you
> will see that Tesla was ADAMANT about his method of power transmission
> NOT being based on Hertzian waves.
>
> The astute student of Tesla's notes and writings and articles and
> patents will see that Tesla was absolutely convinced that he had
> discovered something of great value that would allow him to transmit
> large quantities of power with little loss.
>
> Tesla's giant tower at Wardenclyffe was NOT designed to hurl
> lightning. In fact he went to a great deal of trouble to make sure
> he could generate tremendous electrical pressures WITHOUT having
> streamers. The topload on the coil was designed to suppress streamers
> and allow him to build up very high electrical pressures. Take a look
> at his ground system! He put as much work into the ground system
> as he did into the topload. It was humongous! The ground system
> was his great FOOTHOLD so that with the giant topload he could
> create a mighty PUSH into the atmosphere. Look at his patents on
> conducting immense currents using rarified gas as the conductor.
> Look at his patents on the system of 4 tuned circuits. Read what
> he himself said. When you read Anderson's book you are struck by the
> fact that Tesla considered radio transmissions mere child's play.
> Time and again he harks on the fact that engineers have greatly
> misunderstood what it is he was really trying to do, and how he was
> going to do it.
>
> It is a shame that he was never allowed to give his ideas on power
> transmission a full-scale test. As a result many people dismiss
> his ideas on this subject as the futile ravings of a man who was
> very smart about many things, but totally wrong about power
> transmission.
>
> Recently some scientists have been re-discovering
> some of the bits and pieces of this particular puzzle. I believe
> that in the end Tesla will be vindicated in his hunch that he had
> discovered something of great utility and importance. I just
> hope that he gets the proper credit for having discovered it all
> first, at the turn of the last century...
>
> Fr. Tom McGahee
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> Date: Thursday, May 18, 2000 1:38 PM
> Subject: Re: Tesla's Wireless Power Transmission ==> was Re: Non-tech Qu
>
>
> >Original Poster: wysock-at-ttr-dot-com
> >
> >> Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 18:37:41 -0600
> >> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> >> Subject: Re: Tesla's Wireless Power Transmission ==> was Re:
Non-tech
> >> Question
> >> From: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> >
> >> Original Poster: "Ruud de Graaf" <rdegraaf-at-daxis.nl>
> >>
> >> > Original Poster: "Bill Parn" <parn-at-starpower-dot-net>
> >> >
> >> > > Original Poster: "Ed Phillips" <evp-at-pacbell-dot-net>
> >
> ><snip>
> >
> >To Ruud, Bill, Ed, et. al.
> >
> >The writing below has cuase me to respond by saying that indeed,
> >Tesla's system of wireless power transmission _was not_ Hertzian
> >(TEM) electromagnetic wave propagation through the air as we all
> >know it and employ it today in all our modes of communications,
> >but rather a surface-launched wave over the sphere of the earth.
> >
> >Right now, there are folks who are working very hard to prove what
> >Tesla said, more then 100 years ago; that indeed there is another
> >mode of electric wave propagation, and it doesn't attenuate by the
> >1/r(sq) law that classical Hertzian transverse electro-magnetic wave
> >propagation encounters. This (novel) method of propagating electric
> >energy was completely known to Tesla (and others that followed
> >him like Zenneck, and Waite.) Tesla never once violated Maxwell's
> >full set of equations.
> >
> >I know that my "statements" here on this list will likely be viewed
> >as unfounded or ill-educated. But as Tesla himself said on may
> >occasions. Let them have it. They work for today...I work for
> >tomorrow.
> >
> >I am 100% conviced that the time is very near, when we will all
> >comprehend what Tesla stated as natural law and fact, back in
> >1899-1900.
> >
> >Respectfully,
> >
> >Bill Wysock.
> >
> >> The problem with 'Wireless Power Transmission' and 'Herzian waves' was
that
> >> Tesla believed they were not the same and that 'his waves' could travel
the
> >> earth without much loss. This of course is fiction, because they where
the
> >> same.
> >>
> >> Ruud de Graaf
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >___________________________
> >Tesla Technology Research
> >
> >
>
>