Re: Better Gap Worth Effort

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: Better Gap Worth Effort
• From: "Ruud de Graaf" <rdegraaf-at-daxis.nl> (by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>)
• Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 05:53:27 -0600
• Approved: twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net
• Delivered-To: fixup-tesla-at-pupman-dot-com-at-fixme

Hi Terry,

I think you missed this one. Understandable of course with all this mail!

> Original Poster: "Ruud de Graaf" <rdegraaf-at-daxis.nl>
>
> > Original Poster: Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>
> >
> Snip....
>
> > I have been trying to use very low loss gaps that do not quench well but
I
> > try to get all the streamer energy expended in the first notch too.  By
> the
> > time the second notch comes around, the energy has all been used up
anyway
> > so it does not matter.
> >
> > http://users.better-dot-org/tfritz/site/misc/Ruud02.gif
> >
> > Shows how my little LTR coil is tuned to "do its thing" all in the first
> > notch.  It does not matter if the gap quenches in the first notch or not
> > since the energy is gone by the time that would make any difference.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Terry
>
> Hi Terry,
>
> Great graph Terry (like the filename also :-)) ). This is a simulation,
> right? But wat is it simulating exactly? And what means "do its thing",
> arcing or streaming or neither? Is this simulator so good that you could
use
> it as some kind of proof?
>
> Sorry for the overtime (i'am glad not to be your employer)
>
> Ruud de Graaf
>
>

• Prev: neon primary?
• Next: RE: JHCTES and WinTesla
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread