[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
RE: Another MMC capacitor? Mylar DF = lossy
-
To: tesla@pupman.com
-
Subject: RE: Another MMC capacitor? Mylar DF = lossy
-
From: "Dale Hall" <Dale.Hall@trw.com> (by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla@uswest.net>)
-
Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 12:42:39 -0600
-
Approved: twftesla@uswest.net
-
Delivered-To: fixup-tesla@pupman.com@fixme
Hi Marc,
The dielectric Mylar has a higher dissipation constant, DF, than PP, PE, Mica.
See Scott Hansens latest Cap DF vs F Excel spreadsheet or any Electronics
reference book.
Simply put the molecules comprising the Mylar dielectric
offer greater resistance to alternating cycles of current, creating heat
(loss),
that occurs to a much lesser degree in other dielectrics such as PP, etc.
The result is real power consumed in a larger value Cap parallel resistance or
mathematically equivalent Cap series resistance.
Mylar possesses a respectively low DC current leakage,
but suffers when that amplitude begins alternating worsening
as that amplitude increases and as AC alternates faster (higher frequency)
Regards, Dale
-----Original Message-----
From: Tesla List [mailto:tesla@pupman.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2000 6:36 PM
To: tesla@pupman.com
Subject: Re: Another MMC capacitor?
Original Poster: "Metlicka Marc" <mystuffs@orwell.net>
jim, if it isn't to much trouble could you explain why mylar is lossy
compaired to polypro.? i am intrieged by this mmc production and have
been following terrys threads dilagently.
thank you for your time, marc