[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: UV Detection methods was Ultraviolet light from brush discharge.
-
To: tesla@pupman.com
-
Subject: Re: UV Detection methods was Ultraviolet light from brush discharge.
-
From: "Bryan L. Kaufman MD, MS" <bryan@apexrad.com> (by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla@uswest.net>)
-
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 11:48:20 -0700
-
Approved: twftesla@uswest.net
-
Delivered-To: fixup-tesla@pupman.com@fixme
Phosphorescence can occur at virtually any wavelength with variable time
constants depending on the phosphor. I am not certain that this was the
effect that you witnessed, but it is certainly a candidate. Detergents
commonly contain phosphate compounds and many of these fluoresce and even
phosphoresce. It could be a residual from carpet cleaning.
> I was testing my coil using a static gap in a peice of PVC pipe (sorta like
> an RQ gap), I had the gap just sitting on the carpet sideways (yeah, I know,
> BIG fire hazzard) with an ac fan blowing through the gap away from me. I was
> just running the coil for short runs in the dark when I noticed that the arc
> from the gap hardly lit up the room, except for white papers on the wall,
> which glew (is that a word) bright purple - that is to be expected, but the
> odd thing was, that after I turned off the coil there was a glowing violet
> plume on the carpet in the direction that the fan was blowing (through the
> back of the gap, like a jet engine exhaust). It was like there was
> glow-in-the-dark material in the carpet, and it lasted clearly vissible for
> at least 5 secconds before fading away. Has anyone ever heard of unlikly
> materials aquiring(storing) UV energy like this and slowly releasing
> it? -thought it was weird anyway.
>