[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
RE: Reducing Inductance In Caps And ?, Was RE: Reducing Self Resonance In Rolled Caps
-
To: tesla@pupman.com
-
Subject: RE: Reducing Inductance In Caps And ?, Was RE: Reducing Self Resonance In Rolled Caps
-
From: "Malcolm Watts" <malcolm.watts@wnp.ac.nz> (by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla@uswest.net>)
-
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 17:22:44 -0700
-
Approved: twftesla@uswest.net
-
Delivered-To: fixup-tesla@pupman.com@fixme
Hi Bill,
> Original Poster: "William Parn" <parn@fgm.com>
>
<snip>
> I had read that rolled caps self resonate, because they are a cap
> and a coil all at the same time. However now I understand they must
> have really meant that rolled caps have higher inductance. There
> by slowing the charging and discharging time, that makes sense.
>
> Now the question is if the inductance slows the charging and
> discharging, would not that change the overall freq in the primary?
By an amount commensurate with the ratio of cap inductance to
primary inductance (first order approximation). Could be significant
with a low inductance primary.
> For TC use is it better to use extended foil design or the non
> extended foil design in rolled caps?
Extended foil.
> Does this inductance change the overall capacitance?
No
> Does it change the number of turns needed on the primary?
It could. It doesn't matter though. Long tank wiring also affects total
inductance in the primary circuit.
Regards,
Malcolm