[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Huge MMC?
- To: tesla@pupman.com
- Subject: Re: Huge MMC?
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@pupman.com>
- Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 13:16:11 -0700
- Delivered-To: fixup-tesla@pupman.com@fixme
- In-Reply-To: <F1158YkdavN3qljWwY0000093c6@hotmail.com>
- Resent-Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 14:12:06 -0700
- Resent-From: tesla@pupman.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <6T81YC.A.fkB.jAqM6@poodle>
- Resent-Sender: tesla-request@pupman.com
Original poster: Terry Fritz <twftesla@uswest.net>
Hi,
MMC caps can easily withstand twice their rated voltage. So you can put
3200 volts on a 1600 volt caps for special stuff. However, the quarter
shrinker needs like 100uF I think, so you would need many many caps or many
big snubbers. Probably in that size, the surplus commercial caps are by
far the best. for a single pulse discharge application, MMC caps are
probably overkill. Just the old oil/paper/poly caps do that very well at a
vastly reduced cost.
Cheers,
Terry
At 07:47 PM 12/9/2000 +0000, you wrote:
>Terry has frequently mentioned that RMS current will kill our MMC caps.
>
>How peak current sensitive, and voltage sensitive are they?
>
>I was wondering if a string of 2 or maybe 3 1600 volt caps would withstand a
>10Kv charge to be part of an MMC for a Quarter Shrinker type device, or
>exploding water, or any of the other pulsed power devices.
>Could an MMC of ________(fill in type/number) caps compare with a surplus
>Maxwell cap from Surplus sales of Nebraska?
>
>Thanks,
>Michael.
>____________________________________________________________________________
>_________
>Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
>