RE: Output

[Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>]

Hi Ronn,

I am not familiar with this device.  However, it has to be able to work
with say 400kV, 200kHz, pulsed with a 1% duty cycle.  Not a trivial
specification.  If it will work, be sure and let us know the details of the
device!

You may want to see the following link too for more info:

http://users.better-dot-org/tfritz/site/papers/planant/waveant3.html

Cheers,

	Terry


At 12:25 PM 8/30/00 -0400, you wrote:
>
>
>Would it be possible to measure voltage output of a Tesla Coil with a flux
>density meter? Or would you not be able to get close enough to do any good?
>Just a thought.
>
>Ronn 
>Dukester-at-home-dot-com
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:	Tesla list [SMTP:tesla-at-pupman-dot-com]
>Sent:	Wednesday, August 30, 2000 7:30 AM
>To:	tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
>Subject:	Re: Output
>
>Original poster: Tesla729-at-cs-dot-com 
>
>In a message dated 8/29/00 9:05:42 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
>tesla-at-pupman-dot-com 
>writes:
>
><< Most people use a constant for to estimate voltage. I think that 
> > >1,000,000volts/5feet works best. >>
>
>Hi all,
>
>I do recall a Dicovery Channel special on lightning that had a clip 
>showing Richard Hull's 11-D magnifier in operation for the man-
>made lightning segment and the narrator stated, "these 2 million
>volt sparks leap 10 ft. thru the air and are an awsome reminder of
>the raw power of electricity". I know because I have it on tape. Al-
>so, John Couture's "Tesla Coil Construction Guide" on pg. 14-9
>has a "Sphere Spark vs Kilovolts" log graph which seems to show
>that ~50" represents 1 million volts. I believe this is referring to 
>electrostatic DC charges built up on very large radius spheres, 
>though and was the only comparison data available to John C. -at-
>the time of printing (1994). If I'm not mistaken, John stated this
>himself? Also, this same graph shows that 100" sphere sparks 
>are considerably less than 2 million volts ( KVs vs spark length
>is NOT a linear progression).
>
>
>My $.02 worth,
>David R.
>
>