Re: Output

["Barton B. Anderson" <tesla123-at-pacbell-dot-net> (by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>)]

Hi Terry, 

Tesla list wrote: 
>
> Original poster: Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net> 
>
> "I" use the following to guess the secondary voltage: 
>
> Vs = 1/2 Vp SQRT(Ls/Lp) 
>
> Basically the old equation divided in half to account for about half the 
> energy being eaten in the gap.  It seems to work pretty well in my tests. 
>
> Cheers, 
>
>         Terry

Terry, Microsim output always agrees with the basic inductance formula. Is
there a way to have Microsim account for the gap loss (calc'd loss, not a
simple input or efficiency guess)? 

Bart 
>
>   
> At 01:22 PM 8/28/00 -0500, you wrote: 
> >Most people use a constant for to estimate voltage. I think that 
> >1,000,000volts/5feet works best. I heard Tesla quote that his colorado 
> >springs complex put out up to 15-20MV, which comes to 100 foot discharges...
>
> >Sounds about right... 
> > 
> >----- Original Message ----- 
> >From: Tesla list <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com> 
> >To: <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com> 
> >Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2000 11:54 PM 
> >Subject: Output 
> > 
> > 
> >> Original poster: "Dan Kunkel" <dankunkel-at-hotmail-dot-com> 
> >> 
> >> Coilers, 
> >> 
> >> why is it that we have no way of determining secondary voltage in these 
> >> modern times? how was Tesla always able to quote his output voltage? was 
> >it 
> >> an educated guess (arc length). i think his bold claim was 135 million 
> >> volts. did Golka or the brothers Corum ever state their output? 
> >> 
> >> Dan 
> >> ________________________________________________________________________ 
> >> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
> <http://www.hotmail-dot-com>http://www.hotmail-dot-com 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> > 
> >