[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Smaller NST (9/30) Protection
- To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
- Subject: Re: Smaller NST (9/30) Protection
- From: Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 07:52:24 -0600
- Delivered-To: fixup-tesla-at-pupman-dot-com-at-fixme
- In-Reply-To: <b4.9f41036.26d75eea-at-aol-dot-com>
Hi Joshua,
I have a 9/30 inductive kick LTR coil described with schematics, pictures,
and data at:
http://63.225.104.218/test/TeslaCoils/MyCoils/SmallCoil/SmallCoil.htm
The cap and protection filter is optimized for a 9/30 NST. If you do not
have a rotary sync gap, the primary capacitor size will be far less (8.8nF
resonant, 13.25nF LTR static) and the tap points will change accordingly,
but all else would be pretty much the same.
Cheers,
Terry
At 01:32 AM 8/25/00 -0400, you wrote:
>List,
> Excuse me if this was answered in one of the previous replies, but I was
>wondering what a suitable method of protecting a 9/30 NST would be. I was
>already thinking of having a grounded safety gap (for sure) and I was
>wondering if an LTR cap would be suitable for a series static gap (not yet
>sure how many sections) or if I should just go resonant. I was also
>contemplating if a NST filter like the ones Terry uses would be a good way to
>go (wondering if the lower voltage would have any effect on it, not quite 15
>kV...)? Anywayz, I'm curious, so any help would be helpful and much
>appreciated. I feel that there is still more I must learn until I endeavour
>to construct my own but I find that trustworthy information on this subject
>is hard to come by, as there are many theories and the such that seem to
>contradict each other... Well, thanx for all your help (everybody) on this
>subject.
>
>Regards,
>-Joshua
>