[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Effective Resistance
Hi John, Malcoom,
Tesla list wrote:
>
> Original poster: "Malcolm Watts" <M.J.Watts-at-massey.ac.nz>
>
> An intriguing post:
>
> On 16 Aug 00, at 8:02, Tesla list wrote:
>
> > Original poster: "John H. Couture" <couturejh-at-worldnet.att-dot-net>
> >
> >
> > All -
> >
> > In Tesla coil design the effective resistance (Reff) and the Q factor are
> > unknowns and must be found indirectly. The (Reff) is related to the Q
> factor
> > by the equation
> > Reff = 6.283 * Fres * L/Q
> >
> > The Reff is not the same as the AC Resistance (Rac). I have never seen
> these
> > two resistances calculated for a particular TC where all of the parameters
> > were shown so I am using as an example the JHCTES Ver 3.1 program default
> > coil. If you have downloaded this program you can obtain the necessary coil
>
> > parameters by changing only one input parameter. That parameter is the
> > secondary terminal which should be changed to zero then press calculate.
> > That will give you the necessary resonant frequency (Fres) and other
> > parameters needed below.
> >
> > The AC resistance (Rac) of the secondary coil wiring is found by the
> method
> > shown in the Tesla Coil Design Manual. For Fres = 270 KHZ the equation is
> > Rac = Rdc * Mft * y factor
> > Rdc = 26.7 ohms/Mft Mft = 1000 ft (1571 ft)
> > y factor = 1.25 from TCD Manual Fig 8 page 9-4
>
> How was that "y factor" arrived at?
>
> > Rac = 26.7 * 1.57 * 1.25 = 52.4 ohms
>
>
> > Q factor = Fres/BW
> > BW = Bandwidth = 6 KHZ (from scope)
> > Q factor = 270/6 = 45
> >
> > Reff = 6.283 * Fres * Lcoil/Q factor
> > Reff = 6.283 * 270000 * .0354/45 = 133.45 ohms
> >
> > The 133.45 ohms agrees closely with the graph Fig 7 in the TCD Manual. In
> > this example the Reff is 2.55 times the Rac.
> >
> > Many Radio books including Terman and Henney show several ways to find the
> Q
> > factors and the Effective resistances of radio tuned circuits. However,
> > these methods can also be used for Tesla coils. You may want to make these
> > tests with your coil(s) to see how they compare when using the above
> > calculations as a guide.
>
> Do they show the Rac of which you speak? (Bet = no).
>
> Reff IS the AC resistance (or ESR).
>
> What possible good does it do introducing yet another factor
> which isn't even used?
>
> Regards,
> Malcolm
My undestanding is that Reff is a resitive component because it draws in-phase
current from the AC voltage source. It includes skin effect, eddy currents,
hysterisis losses, I2R losses, and any other effect which causes a "resistive"
loss. I don't understand how there can be a stand-alone component termed "Rac".
Does it describe a particular condition such as a calc to seperate one of these
"resistive" components from the rest?
Bart