[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Maggies and such
Since it is preferable to have the maximum power available in a magnifier,
wouldn't it be better to have a DC power supply feeding it? You would be
running a variable RSG anyway, so it would not be limited by the AC sine
wave. You could adjust capacitance (by adding or subtracting strings on an
MMC) to the break rate for best performance. Is this possible?
Original poster: "Malcolm Watts" <M.J.Watts-at-massey.ac.nz>
On 15 Aug 00, at 10:58, Tesla list wrote:
> Original poster: "sundog" <sundog-at-timeship-dot-net>
>
>
> Hi all!
>
> A question on magnifiers....
>
> I am guessing that the secondary and tertiary coils have to be
at the
> same resonant freq. Makes sense to me that they would be. But
will having
> different inductances (a big fat driver with mediocre turns and a
tertiary
> that's wound with finer wire for more turns so they have the same
res.
> freq)..ideas? I'm wanting to get the surge impedance down on the
driver so
> it can be coupled tighter. Yep, gap losses go up, but this is for
> examination more than long sparks.
The coils do not have to run at the same frequency. For a
conventional slap-it-together system (i.e. without Dr de
Queiroz's special k's incorporated) you treat the
secondary+tertiary as a single entity and tune the primary to
the combination. The voltage rise across each will be in
proportion to each coil's contribution to the total
inductance. You can couple the primary as closely to the
secondary as you like but overall coupling is determined by
the proportion of total inductance coupled to the primary
(i.e. going for k=0.6 in the driver is not going to score you
an overall coupling of 0.6 - far from it in fact). Your
sparklength is pretty much dependent on how much power makes
it to the secondary+extra coil and the peak voltage the system
reaches, so going for low losses in the primary is still a
good idea.
Regards,
Malcolm