Re: Parallel and Series LCR Circuit Qs/ BRS update

["harvey norris" <harvich-at-yahoo-dot-com> (by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>)]

--- Tesla list <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com> wrote:
> Original poster: "Richard Kircher"
> <richard.kircher-at-worldnet.att-dot-net> 
> 
This is a bit off topic but concerning q, or XL/R, on
a large inductance level those values can change from
series to parallel resonance. The  real life and not
predicted q of the 56 Henry coils I use in high freq
research are 15 in series resonance, but only 10 in
parallel resonance. No need to argue about it, thats
what the amperage consumption shows on the coils. In a
parallel resonant condition the 1000 ohm coils have
200,000 ohms impedance where the inductive reactance
is about the same at 99.98% of the impedance. The
coils alone have 20,000 ohms impedance and for all
practical purposes the same inductive reactance. The 5
ma amperage input in 120 volt AC conditions is reduced
10 fold in P.R., but measuring the internal amperage
in the circuit shows the same 5 ma, although the input
is only 0.5 ma. This shows the q of a 10 fold resonant
rise of amperage in P.R. The expected 20 fold increase
in amperage  and voltage  from coil alone measurements
in series resonance does not occur as a 20 fold rise
but only expresses itself as 15, these discrepancies
may be due to the large internal capacitance these
20,000 winds of 23 gauge wire have.

http://msnhomepages.talkcity-dot-com/LaGrangeLn/teslafy/4phase.html
shows what I have called the BRS schematic. Trying two
primaries and an arc gap for a tesla coil application
would probably overstress an NST as Terry has posted,
a series resonant primary will cause a voltage rise
beyond the NST's voltage rating on the capacitive
component. But what has shown to be true is that every
time an arc occurs between series resonant coils, it
instantaneously becomes parallel resonant, this is
what causes a flip of polarity, as each of these
resonances are 180 out of phase with each other.
When filming scope forms from a VHS camera from an
inductor that produces 31,250 hz from the high freq
oscillation, the problem is now identified that every
camera picture frame occuring in one single 60 hz
cycle will contain more traces than one happening in
the same time period when the frquency sweep rate is
turned high enough to observe those events. I have
counted 6 traces at 20 us/div on VHS pause frames,
this corresponds to a sweep time of .002 sec.s for
every sweep,:6 times that time period is .012 sec.s,
roughly ballgame for the .0166 sec time of a 60 hz
cycle. Thus when we see 180 forms on a scope that
doesnt necessarily mean they are occuring
simultaneously, and the whole issue is seemingly swept
under the rug as an illusion, but that doesnt satisfy
me  as a final explanation.

Pictures of the 3 phase dual reluctance altenators
driven for 360 hz are also on the following page past
the cited one,
http://msnhomepages.talkcity-dot-com/LaGrangeLn/teslafy/prototype.html
 I will soon be trying a three phase adaptation of the
BRS idea, in which 3 and not 6 coils  are used to make
the same process on 3 coils. This will be done by
interacting the midpoints of each separate series
resonant phase between the phases, with a kind of
triple arc gap. I believe I should be able to make the
high frequency effect with only the 30 volt input
supplied by the alternator, given the fact that the q
or voltage rise at 360 hz should be around 90 at 6
times the  household frequency. A delta style 10/1
step up transformer is on hand to produce a fairly
phenomenal voltage rise, this may also be tried.
Sincerely HDN


=====
Binary Resonant Systemhttp://www.insidetheweb-dot-com/mbs.cgi/mb124201

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
http://invites.yahoo-dot-com/