[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Output
- To: tesla@pupman.com
- Subject: Re: Output
- From: Terry Fritz <twftesla@uswest.net>
- Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 23:05:06 -0600
- Delivered-To: fixup-tesla@pupman.com@fixme
- In-Reply-To: <F194p7vXee4fDGCl9Fo000000ce@hotmail.com>
Hi Dan,
350 kV at 100kHz is sort of hard to measure ;-)) If one trusts that
lumped theory stuff, you can measure the secondary base current and
multiply that by Xl* of the secondary coil.
* Xl = 2 x pi x F x L
Xl = Secondary reactance in ohms
pi = 3.14159...
F = Is the systems fundamental resonant frequency
L = The secondary coil's inductance
Or, you could make field antenna's like those at:
http://users.better.org/tfritz/site/papers/planant/waveant3.html
I like the antenna's because they are faster and safer to hook to a scope.
Arc lengths have very little meaning when determining voltage because
streamers will propagate far longer than the actual voltage would suggest.
In older literature, there are a lot of odd claims about voltages and such,
most of them or not real good.
Cheers,
Terry
At 04:43 AM 8/27/00 +0000, you wrote:
>Coilers,
>
>why is it that we have no way of determining secondary voltage in these
>modern times? how was Tesla always able to quote his output voltage? was it
>an educated guess (arc length). i think his bold claim was 135 million
>volts. did Golka or the brothers Corum ever state their output?
>
>Dan
>________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
>